The special Year for Priests was inaugurated a few weeks ago by His Holiness Benedict XVI (and not a moment too soon!). I read his letter and a few other things to get myself in a receptive mode for the graces I expect will be cascading down upon me every day of this year. I also thought I ought to take a look at the Rite of Ordination for the priesthood in the Byzantine tradition, just to make sure I remember what I signed up for! In a couple months it will be 18 years since that blessed day of my ordination. (I had been in the monastery 9 years previous to that.) The full story of my priestly vocation can be found on the link in the pages column to your right, entitled (appropriately) My Priestly Vocation.
One must humble oneself, said the Lord, if one is to be exalted. There’s plenty of that in the ordination rite. The devout deacon prostrates three times (with prayers said over him each time)
as he approaches the bishop just before the sanctuary, and then after the ordination he prostrates again before the sanctuary while a litany of petitions is prayed. But for the actual Prayer of Ordination he kneels at the altar. There’s a little symbolic indication that a priest must be humbler than a deacon: when the deacon is ordained, he gets down on one knee before the altar; when the priest is ordained he has to be on both knees!
More humbling to come. The Prayer of Ordination begins: “Divine Grace, which always heals the infirm and supplies what is lacking…” So I was immediately informed that I was infirm and inadequate! Well, it was (and is) true, so it’s good to get all the cards on the table when entering the presence of the Holy God, the Searcher of Hearts. The prayer goes on: “…elevates the devout deacon _____ to the priesthood. Therefore let us pray for him, that the grace of the Holy Spirit may come upon him.” Then the whole congregation says, “Lord, have mercy!” The humbling precedes the exaltation (or elevation), though once elevated the priest must still continue to humble himself. I guess that’s why he prostrates again after he is ordained.
There are other prayers that are said, and here is one of them: “O Lord God, whose power is great and wisdom is unfathomable, whose counsels are more wonderful than those of the sons of men: fill your servant, whom You have chosen to be ordained to the priesthood, with the gifts of your Holy Spirit, so that he may stand worthily and blamelessly before your holy altar, preach the Gospel of your Kingdom, sanctify the word of your truth, offer gifts and spiritual sacrifices and renew your people in the bath of regeneration. Grant also that, at the time of the Second Coming of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ, your only-begotten Son, he may meet Him and receive the reward of a good stewardship, according to the fullness of your goodness. For blessed and glorified is your most honored and sublime name, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, now and forever and unto ages of ages.”
The newly-ordained priest has risen from his prostration by this time, but only to his knees (still humbled!). Then the bishop gives him the “insignia of office”: the various parts of his priestly vestments and the sacred vessels, etc. With each one, after the appropriate prayer or blessing, the bishop declares, and the people respond: Axios! (Greek for “worthy”—in the early Church, it was a question, and the people either affirmed his worthiness or declared him anaxios, unworthy; it is more or less a formality these days, so at least I didn’t have to sweat that one out!)
Among the prayers at the giving of insignia, the one I found most striking was the one that accompanied the giving of the chalice and diskos (paten): “Receive the power to offer sacrifice to God, and to celebrate the Liturgy for the living and those who have fallen asleep in the Lord.” This is really of the essence of the Catholic priesthood: to offer the sacrifice of Christ to the Father, for the sake of the living and the dead. Without this sacrificial element, the priesthood would be little more than a “service profession.” But it is the “elevation” mentioned above which configures the priest in his very being to Christ the High Priest (“who offers and is offered,” as we say in the Liturgy) and thus grants him “the power to offer sacrifice to God.” Earlier in the rite, after making the Profession of Faith, the one about to be ordained must additionally profess (among other things): “I further believe that in the Sacrament of the Most Holy Eucharist bread is changed into the Body and wine into the Blood of our Lord Jesus Christ.” This is sworn upon the Holy Gospel. The Church wants to get it clear that she is not admitting any doubters to the priesthood!
I’ve not gone over the whole rite and all its prayers and details, but that is the essence of it. I remember my ordination Liturgy well. Even though I had been a deacon for 16 months and was used to serving at the altar, nothing quite prepared me for receiving the grace to offer the Sacrifice, putting on the priestly vestments, extending my hand and saying: “Take, eat, this is My body… this is My blood,” and imploring God the Father to “make this bread the body of your Christ, and that which is in this chalice the blood of your Christ, changing them by your Holy Spirit. Amen, amen, amen!” The experience of that day cannot really be communicated in words, for the awareness of the grace of the mystery is ineffable. But it is good to recall it from time to time, so that I can remember both the humbling and the elevation—and to remember that both are required to be a true priest.
I hope and pray that this Year for Priests will be the occasion of the bearing of much spiritual fruit in the Church, and of a genuine renewal of the priesthood, which is so beleaguered and so torn from strife and scandal. Yet it is still the priesthood of Jesus Christ, and He will not cease to purify and heal, admonish and encourage his own to be faithful icons of his sacrificial life and love. He has entrusted much to the priests, for your salvation. Pray for us, that we may be found axios when the Lord will require an account of our stewardship. We are both humbled and exalted by this extraordinary grace from God—and may God enable us to fulfill this demanding but rewarding vocation, for his glory and the salvation of souls.
best friend in this world (to the extent that a monk can have a “best friend”). And so, of course (in my “Murphy’s-Law” perspective), she was the one who had to get cancer and die. Knowing that she had repented of her sins and earnestly served the Lord in the last years of her life, and died with the sacraments and much prayer, I wasn’t freaking out over the possible loss of her soul. Yet bodily death and the immortality of the soul are mysteries not easily comprehended, and there’s much that remains unknown. I trust she is in Heaven, but I can’t wrap my little brain around the concept. It almost seems too good to be true. It’s hard to imagine someone you knew on earth suddenly being transported to a place of unearthly glory and beauty and joy, freed from all their sufferings and sorrows, and being wholly transformed in the process. They really can’t be quite the same anymore, despite the necessary continuity with who they were on earth. And it may be that there’s not much anymore that they could say to us that we have the capacity to understand, though I’m sure they would if we were able to grasp it.
because I can’t imagine what it’s like for her to be in Heaven doesn’t mean I shouldn’t believe in it. Is that really little Laura up there in the glorious City of God, in the midst of angels and saints, wearing the shimmering white robe of her victory and rejoicing in the presence of the Creator of the universe, the Savior of the world? Hey, I knew her when…
variously explained away, but for all that it still remains. A psychiatric or other medical disorder is often the diagnosis offered for otherwise unexplainable phenomena. But, in the context of today’s Gospel (Mt 8:28 – 9:1), I find it difficult to understand how a psychiatric disorder could leap out of two men and enter into a herd of pigs and drive them to their deaths in the sea. It is true that people who really are merely psychotic can seem to have demons, or think they have demons, and so every case has to be evaluated by competent professionals. But we need to understand that there are distinctly spiritual maladies that are incurable by psychotherapy and medications.
has bestowed—for reasons known only to Him—a disproportionate amount of blessings upon our country. There are many things we probably take for granted, like our freedom, religious and otherwise, the abundance of natural resources and natural beauty, general access to adequate food, clothing, and shelter, the strong and (mostly) reliable infrastructure of electric power, water, roads, communications, a high level of technology and modern medicine, etc. I’m quite aware that these aren’t anywhere near flawless, and that even some of our freedoms are eroding, but relative to most other nations we among the most free, prosperous, and even religious (according to statistics concerning faith and churchgoing) nations in the world.
I find it hard to believe that people still buy his phony rhetoric. Catholics said they voted for him because he said he would reduce abortions. He lied so as to get their votes. Do people still believe campaign promises? You don’t listen to what a politician says, you look at what he does, that is, at his voting record, and Obama was 100% pro-abortion and even pro-infanticide. So what made anyone think he would reduce abortions? Besides, even reducing them is not enough. One abortion is way too many. And that business about his being willing to “reach out” to and talk with those who disagree with him on abortion is pure b.s. Before there can be a friendly conversation on such a “divisive” issue you are required to accept Obama’s non-negotiables: abortion will be legal, abortion will be widely available, and you, as a taxpayer, will subsidize it. Now, let’s have a civil discussion and try to find some common ground. No need to get in a huff. I’m here to listen to you. I just happen not to give a damn what you think, because I’ll implement my agenda regardless. But let’s dialogue, shall we?
sufficient water to live on. Every day, year after year, decade after decade. Finally, he began to wear out. Each day was just like the one before it, so the strain and the routine became increasingly wearisome. Walking miles every day for water became a symbol of his weariness, and he started thinking about giving up his life of serving God in the desert.
over, I thought I’d try to look at this feast from a somewhat different perspective this time around. It’s not going to be so different that I would not focus on Peter and Paul, of course! I would like to look at them, however, not primarily in the ways they reflect the mystery of the Church as such, but in the ways we can, as individual members of the Church, benefit from the example of their lives.
engeance is mine—not yours.” When there must be retribution for evil (and let us be aware that not all injustices will be fully redressed before the Day of Reckoning), God has his ways of doing it, and we trust that He will. We can make ourselves available to co-operate with Him—but never to second-guess His wisdom or try to take the reins from the hand of the Almighty.
news!”—did a kind of logical analysis of the situation and came up short. He said, “Well, I’m an old man; my wife’s an old lady, and she’s also sterile. So how can any of this happen, these things you’re saying?” The angel said, “Well! OK, you don’t believe me? Don’t worry, you’ll see! Everything will happen, just as I said. But you—because you’re not rejoicing in the good news, but questioning and trying to reduce the mystery of God to some sort of logical syllogism—you have to shut up! You won’t be able to talk, until all these things come to pass.”
before” the Lord, preparing the people to receive the revelation of the Messiah who would come shortly afterward. The people’s hearts would have to be “turned,” that is, converted, from disobedience to wisdom, if they were both to recognize and receive the One who was to come after John. This was the task of the forerunner, but this turning of hearts to wisdom would not be effected through mere teaching, a kind of Socratic dialogue with seekers of wisdom. No, the model that the angel gave for the forerunner was not Socrates but Elijah, the fiery and uncompromising prophet who called down divine wrath from heaven and stood up fearlessly for the absolute rights of the Lord over all false gods, denouncing all infidelity to the truth.
efore, to increase your ever-deepening insight into the eternal divine mysteries. Well, now an industrious and good-hearted friend has saved you much of the trouble. For an alphabetical list of links to all my posts, just click